First, let me say that none of my players know about my blog here, although I'm sure they will eventually find out. I didn't tell them about it intentionally, as I plan to use this blog to discuss and share opinions and tips on game mastering. As such, game plots about my campaign tend to be revealed here or there, so I thought it best to keep them out of the loop about Black Hole Diaries, at least for now.
As I've mentioned in previous posts, we currently play in a play-by-post game using AD&D 2e rules set in the Forgotten Realms. Of course, it doesn't beat playing at the table, but considering it's the first time all of us have been able to play DnD together as a group for nearly a decade now, it works out quite well for us. I detailed how I have made it work for us to be as close a simulation of the table top experience in another post, so go take a look if you haven't already, and you're interested in exploring the play-by-post method.
Since I plan on discussing my adventure quite a bit on this blog, I thought it best to introduce those curious enough to read all this to some of the players in the game. I've known some of these guys for over 20 years. We have a great cohesion together, because we've been playing so long. While that sounds good, and overall I suppose the pros outweigh the cons in that regard, it can be terribly difficult to design a game that can be both surprising and enjoyable because they have seen and done it all. They know my style as a DM, and I know their styles as players. Fortunately, they are all very talented gamers.
Here they are. The cast of the Northlands and Beyond.
Chris - I've known Chris for 26 years. We have been best friends our entire lives, and truly he is more like a brother to me than just a friend. Then again, the same can be said about all the guys in the group. Chris has a very eclectic taste when it comes to DnD. He doesn't tend to favor any one particular class or race. He's often careful in how he approaches a situation, taking the time to assess as thoroughly as he can. He tends to play this way due to past games where he has been tasked with accomplishing something major for the party, and being unable to get it done. This stems mainly from poor dice rolls rather than bad play on his part. He is the king of the "fumble." The joke in our group is never tell him "all you have to do to hit is NOT roll a 1," as this is often the kiss of death. Truly, he has fumbled more times in critical situations in previous games than I can even recall. His character in our current game Xilus, a Fighter/Mage/Thief half-elf from the village of Conyberry just south of the Neverwinter Wood. Yes, a Fighter/Mage/Thief. I told you he was eclectic.
Ron - Throughout most of our time playing DnD as a group, Ron has always been the primary DM. His imagination is unreal. He has crafted brilliant home brew worlds, and some of the most brilliant adventures one could imagine. He doesn't use modules, preferring to run his own adventures, and honestly, they are better than any module you could pick up. I say this having experienced some module gaming, and also running characters in his games. There is no comparison. Why he isn't working for WotC or some other gaming company is beyond me at this point. He lives far from us all now, which makes getting together to play at the table impossible, so the play-by-post works perfectly. In fact, he's created his own system of rules which he's been using to run his own games for over a decade now. As to his style of play, he tends to put a lot into his characters. He likes to flesh out a great background for them, and make them a little different from the rest. The brilliant thing about this is the fact that he can turn the basic race/class combination from the PHB into something unique without having to devote it to kits and the like. His current character, Bazhur, is a Ranger/Thief from Calimshan. He's stuck in the northlands by accident pretty much, his ship having crashed ashore there. He is in search of his wife and child, who were taken by slavers some time ago. Readers might recall a recent post in which I pointed out how he played a rather remarkable heroic situation for a 1st level character. Give it a read if you haven't already.
Billy F. - I've known Billy F. for about 17 years. He and I tend to get pretty crazy when we get together if there's alcohol involved, which we do pretty routinely. He's a funny guy with a sharp wit. In DnD, he generally tends to play the warrior type. I can't recall an instance where he ever played a mage, in fact. Most of his time has been devoted to playing melee fighters. He decided to try something new in this game, and play a Paladin. He chose this, I imagine, because he knows that often in games I run, it becomes nearly impossible to play the Paladin class. I wouldn't say I am necessarily strict on how I look at the Paladin class, however there are certain benefits derived from the class, and it is one of the few classes in the PHB that must stick to a straight and narrow line in terms of alignment and the like. I simply hold players to those terms, which in an adventuring party full of different alignments and classes, often results in a challenge. It's been pretty interesting thus far, because his presence in the party creates a great dynamic in how they work to accomplish certain goals. Oftentimes, they work behind his back to achieve an end, not because they are doing something evil, but because he simply would not allow it if he knew about it due to the lawful good alignment. So far, he has done a good job playing the character although I have often questioned if he's really having fun with it, because it is such a departure from what he's typically used to running. His character, Davrun, is a human Paladin of Ilmater.
Rouse - Rouse was a latecomer to our group about 15 years ago. He's currently in the military and deployed, so I've been running his character as an NPC for quite some time. Rouse tends to play the lawful good type in just about every game. He loves the Paladin class, but I have sort of broken him from this in the past. We played a one-on-one campaign for about a year in which he played a Paladin that nearly lost his Paladinhood. He generally tends to play the same way with all his characters. I can't think of a time that he's ever played anything but a Paladin or Cleric. In our game, in fact, he's playing a human Cleric of Torm named Stanley.
Billy C. - Billy C. is a large man. He's a very heavy guy with a heart just as big. Truly, he's one of the nicest people I've ever had a privilege to know. His tastes are eclectic as well when it comes to DnD. He has played everything from the large melee warrior, to a devious female thief. He enjoys intrigue and shady plots in the background, and working to expose them. He's also prone to going his own way to look for things when the rest of the party is focused on something else entirely. Sometimes this is rewarding, and other times this has proven to be disastrous for the party in other games. One of the most dreaded things to hear at the gaming table is Billy C. saying "I'm opening the door." He is a good player, however, and his risk/reward style is always something I have to prep for well as a DM. He is Murphy's Law epitomized at the gaming table. If you suspect the party is going to do one thing in an encounter, you can pretty much count on Billy C. doing something entirely different. No matter how much I prepare to plan with him in mind, it never matters though. He always catches me off guard with his antics. Currently in our game he's playing a half-elf Bard named Flute. His main goal being to write tales and sing songs of the party's exploits wherever they go. Currently, he's recovering from an attack from a doppleganger, which nearly cost his character his life. Another instance of his inquisitive nature almost getting the best of him, and the party for that matter. Yet, were it not for his prying, the doppleganger would have likely inflicted even more damage on the party as a whole.
Paul - Paul is currently in the Navy and is deployed at sea. He also tends to be careful in how he handles situations. He rarely takes the lead, but often works in the background with his characters to achieve his own ends. He has a tendency to play the thief in our games. He enjoys slinking about, hiding in shadows and sneaking up on opponents. Much like Billy C., he also relishes in intrigue and the like, and he's prone to go against the grain, although not to the extent of Billy C. He's a good player, and his ideas and input on certain situations have saved the party on more than one occasion. His current character is a human thief named Rabe Branty.
There you have it; the cast of The Northlands and Beyond campaign. Now, that I've taken the time to introduce you to them and their characters, some of my posts about the campaign will make more sense. If you're interested in reading up on the campaign, take a look at our Obsidian Portal page, which we update regularly. Check out the Adventure Log there as well. Several of the players are using the Adventure Log to post entries from their own characters' perspectives, and some of them have been very awesome.
Best of luck to you and your players, may your RPG enjoyment never end! However, I just don't know how you can stand 2nd Edition! ;-) Sorry, I had some bad 2E experiences. Anyway, I'll keep an eye on your OP page. If you're interested, here's my campaign's page:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.obsidianportal.com/campaigns/wanderers-tales
Game on!
Thanks, Drance. Will check yours out as well. I'm interested to hear of your experiences with 2e and what really turned you against the system. I started out in 1e and then quickly moved on to 2e and I didn't find the gameplay to be that different in terms of mechanics, but I understand many hated it for various reasons. There was a lot of crap that was forced on the market back then and it certainly moved away from niche hobby to mainstream market. Still, I chose to run 2e mainly because it is the one edition that all of my friends are familiar with. Some of them spent a lot of time with 1e while others only ever played 2e. But 2e was the common denominator really.
ReplyDeleteI have considered moving the system to Labyrinth Lord or OSRIC, but I would have to convince them to give it a shot.
Ok, I can see why you would pick 2E if that was what was most expedient. Makes total sense. Trust me, I know what it's like to have no time to learn new rules!
ReplyDeleteI guess I don't want to brush over or trivialize my 2E experiences, so I'll try to explain. I think I have a negative view of that edition for several reasons, all pretty much stemming from personal opinion.
One, I cut my teeth on 1E and saw no reason to move to 2E, with what I saw as 2E's unnecessary "overcomplication" of rules. Your opinion on this no doubt varies, and I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on whether or not you think 2E is more complicated that 1E.
Also, by the time 2E came around, I had started playing with a couple of dudes that were super munchkins, so I came to associate 2E with that type of player. Again, I suppose that that is not rational to make that association.
Yeah, ultimately, there's no rational or concrete reason for my dislike I suppose, except the fact that I know I had issues with specific rules but for the life of me I can't remember which rules...probably the way they did weapon and non-weapon proficiencies, for one thing.
Anyway, I'll stop babbling! If you are interested, you can read my gaming testimonial here:
http://unto-the-breach.blogspot.com/search/label/testimonial*
Drance, it's funny that you mention associating the munchkin players with 2e, because that's what I associate with 3e, 3.5, and 4e.
ReplyDeleteIn truth, really the only reason I migrated over to 2e was due to not having much of a choice. Sure, there was still some 1e stuff out there, but everything new that was being introduced into the game was all 2e stuff because 1e was gone. There was no internet for most of us back then. No Labyrinth Lord game to go download and no way to find people still putting out quality stuff in 1e like they do now (Brave Halfling, LotFP, etc.) That stuff didn't exist.
In terms of my opinion on whether the game needed the change, no, I don't think it really did need it, but I think it was a move done out of necessity. AD&D 1e was becoming associated with the occult and the like, and 2e was a blatant move by TSR to get away from that (dropping the demons and essentially renaming them other foreign creatures for example). Do I think it was the right thing to do? No, but it is what it is I guess.
I suppose I just don't hate 2e as much as a lot of others do. I didn't find it overcomplicated really although there were changes that I felt unnecessary. A lot of people hate the proficiencies thing, but it never bothered me really.
Power gamers can ruin any new players' experience in a DnD game regardless of the edition, I've found. More mature gamers tend to lean to the older editions, because that is what they are most familiar with, while the new gamers tend to jump into what is available to them at Barnes and Noble and the like. Their approach to the game is from a newish and immature standpoint. Certainly the recent new editions cater to the power gamers, because that's who they want to sell their games to. Some marketing genius at Hasbro who has never even seen a d20 thinks it's a good idea to "make something like World of Warcraft for table top" and that's what they did.
That said, I'm really indifferent to the edition wars. I'm most familiar with 2e as are most of my players, so that's what we go with. But I'm certainly not going to begrudge any gamer for the system they play. It's all about having fun. Looking forward to reading about your campaign through Obsidian Portal, and checking out that article there.
This is a good post. This post gives truly quality information. I’m definitely going to look into it. Really very useful tips are provided here. Thank you so much. Keep up the good works dnd dice
ReplyDelete